https://jurnal.portalpublikasi.id/index.php/JPTIM/issue/feed Jurnal Penelitian Terapan Ilmu Multidisiplin 2026-09-14T23:02:41+07:00 Open Journal Systems <p class="" data-start="0" data-end="430"><strong data-start="0" data-end="56">Jurnal Penelitian Terapan Ilmu Multidisiplin</strong> adalah jurnal ilmiah yang berfokus pada penelitian terapan dengan pendekatan multidisiplin. Jurnal ini menjadi wadah bagi akademisi, peneliti, dan praktisi dari berbagai bidang ilmu untuk berkolaborasi dan menyebarluaskan hasil penelitian yang mengintegrasikan berbagai disiplin ilmu guna memberikan solusi inovatif terhadap permasalahan nyata di masyarakat dan industri. JPTIM mencakup beragam bidang ilmu, termasuk sains dan teknologi, sosial dan humaniora, ekonomi dan bisnis, kesehatan, pendidikan, serta lingkungan, dengan menekankan pada keterpaduan antarbidang untuk menghasilkan wawasan baru yang lebih komprehensif.</p> <p class="" data-start="0" data-end="430">ISSN : <a href="https://issn.brin.go.id/terbit/detail/20250428011176447" target="_blank" rel="noopener">3090-4587</a></p> <p class="" data-start="0" data-end="430">Publis 4 kali dalam setahun, setiap maret, Juni, september dan Desember.</p> https://jurnal.portalpublikasi.id/index.php/JPTIM/article/view/2215 STUDI KOMPARATIF PREFERENSI GAYA BELAJAR MAHASISWA TEKNIK INFORMATIKA PADA KELAS TRADISIONAL DAN VIRTUAL 2026-09-14T22:56:16+07:00 Afiani Agus Abdillah subamijptim@gmail.com Yeskarwani Gulo Yeskarwani@unpam.ac.id Farhan Martiza Al Syamsik Yeskarwani@unpam.ac.id Abdurahman Yeskarwani@unpam.ac.id <p><em>This study compares the learning modality preferences of Informatics students in traditional and virtual classrooms using the Visual, Auditory, Read/Write, and Kinesthetic (VARK) framework. The reported research design was a quantitative paired comparison involving 80 purposively selected students at Universitas Pamulang who had experienced both learning environments. The instrument comprised 16 items adapted to Informatics learning activities. This manuscript presents descriptive results from the available aggregate tables and examines their internal consistency. Traditional classrooms were dominated by Kinesthetic (37.5%) and Auditory (35.0%) preferences, whereas virtual classrooms were dominated by Visual (42.5%) and Read/Write (32.5%) preferences. These percentages describe marginal distributions and do not identify individual transitions between preference categories. The reported reliability coefficient and paired statistics contain inconsistencies that cannot be resolved without item-level responses, scoring rules, and original analysis output. Consequently, statistical significance and validated effect sizes cannot yet be established. The descriptive pattern may inform the provision of diagrams, written documentation, discussion, and programming practice, but it does not demonstrate that matching instruction to VARK categories improves learning outcomes. Further verification is required before inferential conclusions can be finalized.</em></p> 2026-09-14T00:00:00+07:00 Copyright (c) 2026 Jurnal Penelitian Terapan Ilmu Multidisiplin https://jurnal.portalpublikasi.id/index.php/JPTIM/article/view/2216 INTEGRASI SERVQUAL, ZONE OF TOLERANCE, DAN MODEL FISHBEIN UNTUK MENGUKUR KEPUASAN PELANGGAN JASA LAUNDRY 2026-09-14T22:59:28+07:00 Norita Sinaga Yeskarwani@unpam.ac.id Simon Simarmata Yeskarwani@unpam.ac.id Elga Legianti Yeskarwani@unpam.ac.id <p><em>This study evaluates service quality and customer attitudes at M Laundry by integrating SERVQUAL, the Zone of Tolerance (ZOT), and the Fishbein multi-attribute model. A quantitative descriptive survey obtained 50 complete responses from an estimated population of 150 customers. Because a complete sampling frame and randomization records were unavailable, the responses were treated as a voluntary nonprobability sample. Twenty-five attributes were assessed on five-point scales for adequate, perceived, and desired service. The perception and expectation scales were valid and reliable, with Cronbach's alpha values of 0.960 and 0.912. Mean perceived service was 4.28, while desired service was 4.46, producing an overall gap of -0.18. Parking capacity had the largest gap (-0.44), whereas on-time completion had the smallest (-0.06). All attributes remained within the ZOT, and the Fishbein score of 476.80 indicated a positive attitude. The expectation score was used as a proxy for Fishbein evaluation. Improvements should prioritize parking and handover arrangements, pickup and delivery services, and order-status communication, with the A1 gap targeted at ≥ -0.20 in the next evaluation cycle.</em></p> 2026-09-14T00:00:00+07:00 Copyright (c) 2026 Jurnal Penelitian Terapan Ilmu Multidisiplin