Journal of Research and Publication Innovation
https://jurnal.portalpublikasi.id/index.php/JORAPI
<p>Journal of Research and Publication Innovation is a multidisciplinary and scientific research journal that publishes research papers, review papers, case reports, case studies, book reviews, theses, dissertation works, etc. Published 4 times a year, every January, April, July and October</p> <p>ISSN : <a href="https://issn.brin.go.id/terbit/detail/20230112350949232" target="_blank" rel="noopener">2985-4768</a></p> <p>Email : jorapi@portalpublikasi.id<br />Publication Web Portal: https://portalpublikasi.id/<br />JORAPI Url : https://jurnal.portalpublikasi.id/index.php/JORAPI/index</p>en-USJournal of Research and Publication Innovation PENGARUH DEBT TO EQUITY RATIO DAN RETURN ON EQUITY TERHADAP PRICE TO BOOK VALUE PADA PT ASTRA INTERNATIONAL, Tbk PERIODE 2014 – 2023
https://jurnal.portalpublikasi.id/index.php/JORAPI/article/view/1688
<p><em>The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of Debt to Equity Ratio and Return On Equity on Price to Book Value at PT Astra International, Tbk both partially and simultaneously. The research method used is a quantitative method with an associative approach. The sample used is the Financial Report of PT Astra International, Tbk for 10 (ten) years which has been made into time series data. Data analysis in this study uses classical assumption tests, multiple linear regression analysis, hypothesis testing and determination coefficient analysis. The results of this study are multiple linear regression equations of Y = -1.892 + 0.046X1 - 0.028X2 + e. Partially, the Debt to Equity Ratio variable has a positive and significant effect on Price to Book Value with the results of tcount > ttable or (7.045 > 1.895) with a significance level of 0.00 < 0.05. Meanwhile, the Return On Equity variable has no significant effect on Price to Book Value with the result of tcount < ttable or (-1.079 <1.895) with a significance level of 0.316 > 0.05. Simultaneously, Debt to Equity Ratio and Return On Equity have a positive and significant effect on Price to Book Value with the value of Fcount > Ftable, namely (24.987 > 4.737) with a significance level of 0.001 < 0.05. The coefficient of determination is 84.2%, the remaining 15.8% is influenced by other variables and factors.</em></p>Andy RiyantoSri Mardiana
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Research and Publication Innovation
2025-04-012025-04-01328997PENGARUH LINGKUNGAN KERJA FISIK DAN MOTIVASI KERJA TERHADAP KINERJA KARYAWAN PADA PT LULU GROUP RETAIL REGIONAL OFFICE CAKUNG JAKARTA TIMUR
https://jurnal.portalpublikasi.id/index.php/JORAPI/article/view/1685
<p>The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of Physical Work Environment and Work Motivation on Employee Performance at PT Lulu Group Retail Regional Office both partially and simultaneously. This research method uses a quantitative method with a descriptive approach. The sampling technique in this study used a non-probability sampling technique, namely a saturated sample with a total of 67 respondents. Data analysis using the SPSS version 23 program. The data analysis techniques used were: validity test, reliability test, normality test, multicollinearity test, heteroscedasticity test, multiple regression test, simultaneous correlation coefficient test, simultaneous determination coefficient test, T test and F test. Partial hypothesis testing of the Physical Work Environment variable (X1) obtained a calculated T value> T table (4.100> 1.997) and a significance value of 0.00 <0.05. This means that the Physical Work Environment (X1) has a significant effect on Employee Performance (Y). Partial hypothesis testing of the Work Motivation variable (X2) obtained a calculated T value > T table (5.269 > 1.997) and a significance value of 0.001 < 0.05. This means that Work Motivation (X2) has a significant effect on Employee Performance (Y). Simultaneous hypothesis testing obtained a calculated F value > F table (141.485 > 3.140) and a significance value of 0.000 < 0.05. It can be concluded that the Physical Work Environment (X1) and Work Motivation (X2) have a significant effect both simultaneously on Employee Performance (Y). The determination obtained Adjusted R square of 0.807, meaning that the variables of the Physical Work Environment and Work Motivation together have a contribution of 80.7% to Employee Performance. While the remaining 19.3% is influenced by other factors not examined in this study</p>Dina ApriyaniEndang Kustini
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Research and Publication Innovation
2025-04-012025-04-01327081ANALISIS PERAN SERIKAT PEKERJA/SERIKAT BURUH FSB GARTEKS DALAM MENINGKATKAN KOMPENSASI DI PT PANARUB INDUSTRY KOTA TANGERANG
https://jurnal.portalpublikasi.id/index.php/JORAPI/article/view/1687
<p>Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui Kompensasi pekerja/buruh di PT. Panarub Industry melalui analisis peran serikat pekerja/serikat buruh dengan memakai metode kualitatif, hambatan-hambatan yang dihadapi oleh pekerja untuk mendapatkan kompensasi yang layak di PT. Panarub Industry, upaya-upaya yang dilakukan untuk mengatasi hambatan yang di hadapi para pekerja dalam meningkatkan kompensasi pekerja/buruh di PT. Panarub Industry. Penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa Serikat Pekerja/Serikat Buruh Federasi Serikat Buruh Garmen Kerajinan Tekstil Kulit dan Sentra Industri disingkat FSB GARTEKS merupakan nama organisasi serikat pekerja yang terdapat di PT. Panarub Industry. Peranan Serikat Pekerja di perusahaan ini sangat berpengaruh dalam mensejahterakan pekerja/buruh, termasuk ikut andil dalam menyusun Perjanjian Kerja Bersama (PKB). Serikat Pekerja FSB GARTEKS mengalami hambatan yaitu adanya Undang-Undang terbaru yaitu Undang-Undang CiptaKerja atau OMNIBUSLAW cluster ketenagakerjaan yang membuat perundingan Perjanjian Kerja Bersama (PKB) menjadi tidak selesai atau menggantung dikarenakan tidak menemukan kesepakatan dalam setiap perundingan. Upaya-upaya yang dilakukan adalah dengan terus mengajak manajemen PT. Panarub Industry untuk melakukan perundingan Perjanjian Kerja Bersama (PKB) dan menyepakati hasil perundingan dengan cepat agar tidak berlarut-larut dalam kekosongan hukum yang ada di PT. Panarub Industry demi terciptanya Kompensasi pula pada pekerja/buruh di PT. Panarub Industry.</p>Diah PriditiaRahmi Andini Syamsuddin
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Research and Publication Innovation
2025-04-012025-04-01328288PENGARUH FASILITAS KANTOR DAN DISIPLIN KERJA TERHADAP KINERJA PEGAWAI DI KANTOR DESA PELAWAD KABUPATEN SERANG
https://jurnal.portalpublikasi.id/index.php/JORAPI/article/view/1684
<p><em>This study aims to analyze the influence of office facilities partially on employee performance at the Pelawad Village Office, Serang Regency, to analyze the influence of work discipline partially on employee performance at the Pelawad Village Office, Serang Regency, to analyze the influence of office facilities and work discipline simultaneously on employee performance at the Pelawad Village Office, Serang Regency. The methodology used is quantitative descriptive using multiple linear regression. The results of the study showed 1) the results of the t-test showed a sig value for the influence of office facilities (X1) on employee performance (Y) was 0.041 <0.05, and the t-count value> t-table, which was 2.095> 2.007. So the office facilities variable (X1) has a significant effect on employee performance, 2) the results of the t-test showed a sig value for the influence of work discipline (X3) on employee performance (Y) was 0.013 <0.05, and the t-count value> t-table, which was 2.570> 2.007. So the work discipline variable (X3) has a significant effect on employee performance, 3) The results of the F test show a calculated F value of 13.708> 3.18 with a significance of 0.000 <0.05, so it can be stated that this hypothesis (Ha) is accepted. Simultaneously, the independent variables of this study, namely office facilities and work discipline, have a significant effect on the dependent variable of employee performance</em></p>Linda Dwi AstutiLismiatun
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Research and Publication Innovation
2025-04-012025-04-01325869PENGARUH GAYA KEPEMIMPINAN DAN MOTIVASI TERHADAP KINERJA KARYAWAN PADA PT ARSYHNDO TEKNIK NUSANTARA KOTA TANGERANG
https://jurnal.portalpublikasi.id/index.php/JORAPI/article/view/1682
<p>Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh gaya kepemimpinan dan motivasi terhadap kinerja karyawanpada PT Arshyndo Teknik Nusantara Kota Tangerang. Metode yang digunakan adalah Metode Kuantitatif dengan pendekatan asosiatif. Teknik sampling yang digunakan yaitu sampling jenuh dengan 55 responden. Hasil penelitian gaya kepemimpinan berpengaruh signifikan terhadap kinerja karyawan secara parsial, ditunjukan oleh persamaan regresi linear sederhana Y=5,885+0,826X1 dimana nilai koefisien beta bernilai positif artinya apabila gaya kepemimpinan mengalami peningkatan maka kinerja karyawan juga akan meningkat. Hal ini dibuktikan dengan uji hipotesis diperoleh nilai thitung>ttabel (10,364>2,005) dan diperkuat oleh nilai sig<0,05 (0,000<0,05). Motivasi berpengaruh signifikan terhadap kinerja karyawan secara parsial ditunjukkan oleh persamaan regresi linier sederhana Y=3,456+0,872X2 dimana nilai koefisien beta bernilai positif artinya apabila motivasi mengalami peningkatan maka kinerja karyawan juga akan meningkat. Hal ini dibuktikan dengan uji hipotesis diperoleh nilai thitung>ttabel(10,547>2,005) dan diperkuat oleh nilai sig<0,05 (0,000< 0,05).Hasil penelitian terhadap kinerja karyawan ditunjukkan oleh persamaan regresi linear bergandaY=2,192+0,429X1+0,486X2 dimana nilai koefisien beta bernilai positif artinya apabilagaya kepemimpinan danmotivasimengalamipeningkatanmakakinerjakaryawan juga akan meningkat. Hal ini dibuktikan dengan hasil uji hipotesis secarasimultan diperoleh nilai Fhitung>Ftabel(68,635>3,18) dan diperkuat oleh nilai sig<0,05 (0,000<0,05). Hasil uji koefisien determinasi variabel gaya kepemimpinan dan motivasi memberikan pengaruh sebesar 52,6% terhadap kinerja karyawan pada PT Arshyndo Teknik Nusantara. Artinya terbukti terdapat pengaruh yang signifikan secara simultan antara gaya kepemimpinan dan motivasi terhadap kinerja karyawan (Y).</p>Muhamad RaflyJaenudin
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Research and Publication Innovation
2025-04-012025-04-01323847PENGARUH DEBT TO EQUITY RATIO DAN TOTAL ASSETS TURNOVER TERHADAP NET PROFIT MARGIN PADA PT MAYORA INDAH Tbk PERIODE 2013-2023
https://jurnal.portalpublikasi.id/index.php/JORAPI/article/view/1683
<p><em>This research aims to determine whether there is a significant influence between Debt to Equity Ratio (DER) and Total Assets Turnover (TATO) on Net Profit Margin (NPM) at PT Mayora Indah Tbk for the 2013-2023 period, either partially or simultaneously. The method used in this research is a quantitative descriptive research method, using secondary data from the financial reports of PT Mayora Indah Tbk for the 2013-2023 period. Based on partial research results, the Debt to Equity Ratio (DER) does not have significant influence on the Net Profit Margin (NPM) at PT Mayora Indah Tbk. This can be proven from the results of the t<sub>count</sub> value of -1.442 < t<sub>table</sub> of 2.306 with a significant value of 0.187 where the value is 0.187 > 0.05. Partially Total Assets Turnover (TATO) has no significant influence on Net Profit Margin (NPM) at PT Mayora Indah Tbk. This can be proven from the results of the t<sub>count</sub> value of -2.130 < t <sub>table</sub> 2.306 with a significant value of 0.066 where the value is 0.066 > 0.05. Simultaneously, the Debt to Equity Ratio (DER) and Total Assets Turnover (TATO) have no significant influence on the Net Profit Margin (NPM) at PT Mayora Indah Tbk. This can be proven from the results of the F<sub>count </sub>value of 2.998 < F<sub>table</sub> value of 4,46 with a significant value of 0.107 where the value is 0.107 > 0.05. The R Square value was 28.6%, while 71.4% was accounted for by other variables not examined in this study</em></p>Maulida Fatichatur RizqiyahFerdina Watiningsih
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Research and Publication Innovation
2025-04-012025-04-01324857PENGARUH MOTIVASI KERJA DAN DISIPLIN KERJA TERHADAP KINERJA KARYAWAN PADA PT ESHAN GEMILANG PRATAMA KOTA TANGERANG
https://jurnal.portalpublikasi.id/index.php/JORAPI/article/view/1681
<p><em>This</em> <em>study</em> <em>aims</em> <em>to</em> <em>determine</em> <em>the</em> <em>effect</em> <em>of</em> <em>motivation</em> <em>and</em> <em>work</em> <em>discipline</em> <em>on</em> <em>employee</em> <em>performance</em> <em>at</em> <em>PT</em> <em>Eshan</em> <em>Gemilang</em> <em>Pratama</em> <em>Kota</em> <em>Tangerang.</em> <em>The</em> <em>research</em> <em>method</em> <em>used</em> <em>in</em> <em>the</em> <em>study</em> <em>is</em> <em>the</em> <em>Quantitative</em> <em>Method.</em> <em>The</em> <em>sampling</em> <em>technique</em> <em>used</em> <em>is</em> <em>saturated</em> <em>sampling</em> <em>with</em> <em>57</em> <em>respondents.</em> <em>Data</em> <em>collection</em> <em>using</em> <em>questionnaires</em> <em>while</em> <em>data</em> <em>analysis</em> <em>is</em> <em>carried</em> <em>out</em> <em>using</em> <em>the</em> <em>Validity</em> <em>Test</em> <em>analysis,</em> <em>Reliability</em> <em>Test,</em> <em>Classical</em> <em>Assumption</em> <em>Test</em> <em>(Normality</em> <em>Test,</em> <em>Kolmogorov</em> <em>Smirnov</em> <em>Test,</em> <em>Multicollinearity</em> <em>Test,</em> <em>Autocorrelation</em> <em>Test,</em> <em>Heteroscedasticity</em> <em>Test,</em> <em>Glejser</em> <em>Test</em> <em>Model)</em> <em>Simple</em> <em>Linear</em> <em>Regression</em> <em>Test,</em> <em>Multiple</em> <em>Linear</em> <em>Regression</em> <em>Test,</em> <em>Correlation</em> <em>Coefficient</em> <em>Test,</em> <em>Determination</em> <em>Test,</em> <em>Partial</em> <em>Test</em> <em>(t</em> <em>Test)</em> <em>Simultaneous</em> <em>Test</em> <em>(f</em> <em>Test).</em> <em>At</em> <em>a</em> <em>significance</em> <em>rate</em> <em>of</em> <em>5%,</em> <em>the</em> <em>results</em> <em>of</em> <em>the</em> <em>study</em> <em>found</em> <em>that:</em> <em>The</em> <em>results</em> <em>of</em><em> the</em> <em>study</em> <em>showed</em> <em>that</em> <em>motivation</em> <em>has</em> <em>a</em> <em>significant</em> <em>effect</em> <em>on</em> <em>employee</em> <em>performance</em> <em>partially,</em> <em>indicated</em> <em>by</em> <em>the</em> <em>simple</em> <em>linear</em> <em>regression</em> <em>equation</em> <em>Y</em> <em>=</em> <em>0.403</em><em> +</em> <em>0.954</em> <em>X1</em> <em>showing</em> <em>a</em> <em>positive</em> <em>value</em> <em>which</em> <em>means</em> <em>there</em> <em>is</em> <em>a</em> <em>change</em> <em>in</em> <em>the</em> <em>same</em><em> direction,</em> <em>where</em> <em>if</em> <em>work</em> <em>motivation</em> <em>(X1)</em> <em>increases</em> <em>by</em> <em>one</em> <em>unit,</em> <em>employee</em> <em>performance</em> <em>(Y)</em> <em>will</em> <em>also</em> <em>increase.</em> <em>This</em> <em>is</em> <em>evidenced</em> <em>by</em> <em>the</em> <em>hypothesis</em> <em>test</em> <em>obtained</em> <em>a</em> <em>calculated</em> <em>t</em> <em>value></em> <em>t</em> <em>table</em> <em>(25.290></em> <em>2.004)</em> <em>and</em> <em>reinforced</em> <em>by</em> <em>a</em> <em>significance</em> <em>value</em> <em>of</em> <em><0.05</em> <em>(0.000<0.05).</em> <em>Work</em> <em>Discipline</em> <em>has</em> <em>a</em> <em>significant</em> <em>effect</em> <em>on</em> <em>employee</em> <em>performance</em> <em>partially</em> <em>indicated</em> <em>by</em> <em>the</em> <em>simple</em> <em>linear</em> <em>regression</em> <em>equation</em> <em>Y</em> <em>=</em> <em>3.134</em><em> +</em> <em>0.917</em> <em>X2,</em> <em>where</em> <em>the</em> <em>coefficient</em> <em>value</em> <em>is</em> <em>positive,</em> <em>meaning</em> <em>that</em> <em>if</em> <em>work</em> <em>discipline</em> <em>increases,</em> <em>employee</em> <em>performance</em> <em>will</em> <em>also</em> <em>increase.</em> <em>This</em> <em>is</em> <em>evidenced</em> <em>by</em> <em>the</em> <em>hypothesis</em> <em>test</em> <em>obtained</em> <em>a</em> <em>calculated</em> <em>t</em> <em>value></em> <em>t</em> <em>table</em> <em>(24.455></em> <em>2.004)</em> <em>and</em> <em>reinforced</em> <em>by</em> <em>a</em> <em>significance</em> <em>value</em> <em>of</em> <em><0.05</em> <em>(0.000<0.05).</em> <em>The</em> <em>results</em> <em>of</em> <em>the</em> <em>study</em> <em>on</em> <em>employee</em> <em>performance</em> <em>are</em> <em>shown</em> <em>by</em> <em>the</em> <em>multiple</em> <em>linear</em> <em>regression</em> <em>equation</em> <em>Y</em><em> =</em> <em>0.805</em> <em>+</em> <em>0.513</em> <em>X1</em> <em>+</em> <em>0.451</em> <em>X2,</em> <em>where</em> <em>the</em> <em>coefficient</em> <em>value</em> <em>is</em> <em>positive,</em> <em>which</em> <em>means</em> <em>that</em> <em>there</em> <em>is</em> <em>a</em> <em>change</em> <em>in</em> <em>the</em> <em>same</em> <em>direction,</em> <em>where</em> <em>work</em> <em>motivation</em> <em>and</em> <em>work</em> <em>discipline</em> <em>do</em> <em>not</em> <em>change</em> <em>or</em> <em>are</em> <em>fixed,</em> <em>then</em> <em>employee</em> <em>performance</em> <em>will</em> <em>remain</em> <em>positive.</em> <em>This</em> <em>is</em> <em>evidenced</em> <em>by</em> <em>the</em> <em>results</em> <em>of</em> <em>the</em> <em>simultaneous</em> <em>hypothesis</em> <em>test</em> <em>obtained</em> <em>the</em> <em>value</em> <em>of</em> <em>Fcount></em> <em>Ftable</em> <em>(469.202></em> <em>3.16)</em> <em>and</em> <em>strengthened</em> <em>by</em> <em>a</em> <em>significance</em> <em>value</em> <em>of</em> <em><0.05</em> <em>(0.000</em> <em><0.05).</em> <em>The</em> <em>results</em> <em>of</em> <em>the</em> <em>determination</em> <em>coefficient</em> <em>test</em> <em>of</em> <em>the</em> <em>work</em> <em>motivation</em> <em>variable</em> <em>(X1)</em> <em>and</em> <em>work</em> <em>discipline</em> <em>(X2)</em> <em>have</em> <em>an</em> <em>influence</em> <em>of</em> <em>97.2%</em> <em>on</em> <em>employee</em> <em>performance</em> <em>at</em> <em>PT</em> <em>Eshan</em> <em>Gemilang</em> <em>Pratama.</em> <em>Thus</em> <em>Ho</em> <em>is</em> <em>rejected</em> <em>and</em> <em>H3</em> <em>is</em> <em>accepted.</em> <em>This</em> <em>means</em> <em>that</em> <em>there</em> <em>is</em> <em>a</em> <em>significant</em> <em>simultaneous</em> <em>influence</em> <em>between</em> <em>work</em> <em>motivation</em> <em>(X1)</em> <em>and</em> <em>work</em> <em>discipline</em> <em>(X2)</em> <em>on</em> <em>employee</em> <em>performance</em> <em>(Y).</em></p>Nova Kurnia DewiSutrisno
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Research and Publication Innovation
2025-04-012025-04-01322737PENGARUH CURRENT RATIO, DEBT TO EQUITY RATIO, DAN RETURN ON EQUITY TERHADAP PRICE TO BOOK VALUE PADA PT SEKAR LAUT TBK PERIODE 2014-2023
https://jurnal.portalpublikasi.id/index.php/JORAPI/article/view/1680
<p><em>This research aims to determine the influence of the Current Ratio, Debt to Equity Ratio, and Return on Equity on Price to Book Value at PT Sekar Laut Tbk for the 2014–2023 period. The research uses quantitative methods. The population used is the financial position report and profit and loss financial report. The type of sample used is purposive sampling, namely the financial position report and profit and loss financial report for the period 2014–2023. Data analysis techniques include descriptive tests, classical assumption tests, multiple linear regression, correlation coefficients, t tests, f tests and coefficient of determination tests. All statistical tests use statistical product and service solution version 20. The research results show that partially, the Current Ratio has an effect on Price to Book Value with a tcount of 3.418 > ttable 2.447 and a significance of 0.009 < 0.05. Debt to Equity Ratio and Return on Equity have no effect with tcount values of -1.789 and -0.167 respectively, smaller than ttable. Simultaneously, the three variables influence Price to Book Value (Fcount 12.493 > Ftable 4.7374; sig. 0.005 < 0.05). The correlation coefficient (R2) of 0.862 indicates a very strong relationship, while the adjusted R² of 0.793 indicates that 79.3% of the variation in Price to Book Value is obtained by independent variables, and the remaining 20.7% is influenced by other variables not examined in this research.</em></p>Novi Misna YantiDede Hendra
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Research and Publication Innovation
2025-04-012025-04-01321926PENGARUH KOMPENSASI DAN MOTIVASI TERHADAP PRODUKTIVITAS KERJA KARYAWAN PADA PT. PROVICES INDONESIA JAKARTA
https://jurnal.portalpublikasi.id/index.php/JORAPI/article/view/1678
<p>The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of compensation and motivation on work productivity at PT. Provices Indonesia Jakarta. both partially and simultaneously. The method used in this study is a quantitative method. The sampling technique used is saturated sampling, which uses a sample of 95 respondents. The data analysis technique used is statistical analysis with validity test, reliability test, classical assumption test, simple linear test, multiple linear regression test, correlation coefficient, determination coefficient, t test and F test. The results of the study showed that compensation has a significant effect on employee performance partially, indicated by the simple linear regression equation Y = 48.465 + 0.251 Xₗ where the beta coefficient value is positive, which means that if compensation increases, employee work productivity will also increase. This is evidenced by the hypothesis test obtained a calculated t value> t table or (3.514> 1.662) and is reinforced by the ρ value <Sig.0.05 or significance <0.05 (0.000 <0.05). Motivation has a significant effect on employee work productivity partially indicated by the simple linear regression equation Y = 21,400 + 0.686X₂ where the beta coefficient value is positive, which means that if work discipline increases, employee work productivity will also increase. This is evidenced by the results of the hypothesis test obtained a calculated t value> t table or (8,286> 1.662) and is strengthened by the ρ value <Sig.0.05 or a significance value <0.05 (0.000 <0.05). The results of the study of compensation and motivation on employee work productivity are indicated by the multiple linear regression equation Y = 122,981 + 0.072 Xₗ + 0.645 X₂. where the coefficient value is positive, which means that if compensation and motivation increase, employee work productivity will also increase. This is proven by the results of the simultaneous hypothesis test obtained the value of F count > F table (35.095 > 3.10) and strengthened by the significance value < 0.05 (0.000 < 0.05). The results of the coefficient of determination test of the compensation variable (Xₗ) and motivation (X₂) have an influence of 11.7% on employee work productivity at PT. Provices Indonesia Jakarta. Thus H0 is rejected and H3 is accepted. This means that there is a significant simultaneous influence between Compensation (Xₗ) and Motivation (X₂) on employee work productivity (Y).</p>Ardi RiskiyantoThamrin
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Research and Publication Innovation
2025-04-012025-04-0132110PENGARUH BUDAYA ORGANISASI DAN KEPUASAN KERJA TERHADAP KINERJA KARYAWAN PADA CV. PESONA MITRATAMA ELEKTRINDO BEKASI
https://jurnal.portalpublikasi.id/index.php/JORAPI/article/view/1679
<p><em>The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of Organizational Culture and Job Satisfaction on Employee Performance at CV. Pesona Mitratama Elektrindo Bekasi, both partially and simultaneously. The research method used in this study is a quantitative method. The sample consists of 70 employees. Data collection techniques involve both primary and secondary data. The results of the analysis show that: (1) partially, there is a positive influence of Organizational Culture on Employee Performance at CV. Pesona Mitratama Elektrindo Bekasi, as evidenced by the regression equation Y = 13.220 + 0.752X1 and the t-value of 3.143 > t-table 1.996 with a significance value of 0.000 < 0.05. (2) Partially, there is a positive influence of Job Satisfaction on Employee Performance at CV. Pesona Mitratama Elektrindo Bekasi, as evidenced by the regression equation Y = 14.399 + 0.729X2, and the t- value of 7.958 > t-table 1.996 with a significance value of 0.000 < 0.05. (3) Simultaneously, there is a positive influence of Organizational Culture and Job Satisfaction on Employee Performance at CV. Pesona Mitratama Elektrindo Bekasi, as evidenced by the linear regression equation Y = 9.255 + 0.276X1 + 0.575X2, a correlation coefficient of 0.865, a coefficient of determination of 74.9%, and an F-value of 99.778 > F-table 3.13 with a significance level of 0.000 < 0.005.</em></p>Ayu Nurul FatimahAden Prawiro Sudarso
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Research and Publication Innovation
2025-04-012025-04-01321118