PYTHON PROGRAMMING AND DIGITAL ETHICS TRAINING FOR NAFIDATUNNAJAH STUDENTS TO DEVELOP DIGITAL COMPETENCIES AND CHARACTER
Keywords:
Python, digital ethics, digital literacy, santri, programming, islamic boarding schoolAbstract
The development of digital technology requires strengthening both technical skills and digital literacy and ethics among learners, including students in Islamic boarding schools (santri). This community service program was conducted to improve the basic Python programming skills and strengthen the understanding of digital ethics among the santri of Pondok Pesantren Nafidatunnajah. The activity involved 30 santri and was conducted through a workshop combining lectures, demonstrations, hands-on practice, discussions, quizzes, and an introduction to the application of Python for simple needs. The technical materials covered programming logic, an introduction to Python, writing simple scripts, data processing, and task automation. Meanwhile, the digital ethics materials emphasized data security, information integrity, privacy, responsible use of social media, and the use of technology in accordance with the values of the Islamic boarding school. The implementation method was designed to be participatory and contextual, using learning-by-doing, blended learning, and project-based learning approaches. The results of the activity showed positive responses from the participants, improved practical understanding of Python, and increased awareness of the importance of using technology safely and responsibly. Participants also gained experience in connecting programming skills with simple administrative tasks within the Islamic boarding school environment. Since the final report does not provide detailed numerical pre-test and post-test scores, the achievements of the program in this article are reported based on qualitative findings from the activities, practice observations, question-and-answer sessions, and descriptions of the community service outcomes. This program demonstrates that integrating technical competencies with digital character development can serve as a relevant training model for strengthening digital literacy in Islamic boarding school environments.
References
Crouch, M., and J. Pearce, “Teaching programming to novices: Strategies for engagement and retention,” Journal of Computing in Education, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 123–140, 2018.
C. Dede and J. Richards, “Digital literacy and ethical behavior in educational contexts,” Educational Technology Research and Development, vol. 60, no. 5, pp. 803–820, 2012.
L. He and R. Freeman, “Contextualized coding curricula: Adapting programming instruction for local needs,” International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, vol. 17, no. 1, p. 45, 2020.
J. Lave and E. Wenger, Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 1991.
Ministry of Education and Culture of the Republic of Indonesia, Panduan Penyusunan Kurikulum Pendidikan Vokasi dan Pengembangan Kewirausahaan di Perguruan Tinggi. Jakarta, Indonesia: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 2020.
M. Nazir and A. Hartono, “Pengembangan modul pembelajaran berbasis proyek untuk literasi digital di pesantren,” Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 287–302, 2019.
M. Newman and D. Clarke, “From research to revenue: University technology transfer and commercialization strategies,” Technology Transfer Review, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 15–38, 2017.
S. Rahmawati and B. Sutrisno, “Etika digital dalam perspektif pendidikan Islam: Kajian teoritis dan praktik,” Al-Tarbawi: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 67–85, 2021.
M. Russell and P. Norvig, Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach, 4th ed. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Pearson, 2020.
World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), “Web accessibility and best practices for educational content,” W3C Working Group Note, 2018.
C. Audrin and B. Audrin, “Key factors in digital literacy in learning and education: A systematic literature review using text mining,” Education and Information Technologies, vol. 27, pp. 7395–7419, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10639-021-10832-5.
H. Tinmaz, Y.-T. Lee, M. Fanea-Ivanovici, and H. Baber, “A systematic review on digital literacy,” Smart Learning Environments, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 21, 2022, doi: 10.1186/s40561-022-00204-y.
J. Katona and K. I. K. Gyonyoru, “Enhancing programming education through AI-driven tools and innovative pedagogical models: A systematic study on student engagement, retention, and self-regulation,” Journal of Computers in Education, 2026, doi: 10.1007/s40692-026-00391-4.
W. Zhang, Y. Guan, and Z. Hu, “The efficacy of project-based learning in enhancing computational thinking among students: A meta-analysis of 31 experiments and quasi-experiments,” Education and Information Technologies, vol. 29, pp. 14513–14545, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s10639-023-12392-2.
A. Qazi, R. G. Raj, G. Hardaker, and C. Standing, “A systematic literature review on opinion types and sentiment analysis techniques,” Internet Research, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 608–630, 2017
