THE PERFECTION OF CHATGPT IN MAKING FAST-ACCURATE REPORTS OF STUDENTS AT SMK PARUNG
Abstract
ChatGPT is an artificial intelligence (AI) system that can interact with users through a conversational format. Anyone can use ChatGPT to read and understand the contents of files or enter questions into the ChatGPT interface, allowing the AI to analyze and answer questions on various topics. The ChatGPT training program for Parung Vocational High School (SMK) was conducted to improve students' digital literacy and writing skills. Amid rapid technological advances, the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into the learning process has become an urgent need. Through this activity, participants were introduced to ChatGPT as a digital aid that can be used to compile report outlines, improve spelling and sentence structure, and enrich written/report content quickly, precisely, and accurately. The workshop was designed based on hands-on practice, where students were trained to actively use ChatGPT features in completing their academic assignments and vocational projects. Evaluation of the activity showed that students improved their understanding of how to write reports that were coherent, logical, and adhered to writing standards. Furthermore, students became more confident and confident in expressing their ideas in writing. With this approach, the workshop not only strengthened academic skills but also taught the responsible and beneficial use of AI technology in vocational education.
References
X. H. Nguyen, C. B. Nguyen, and C. S. Nguyen, “The Influence of ChatGPT: A Comprehensive Analysis of Its Impact on Communication and Decision-Making,” Int. J. Recent Res. Math. Comput. Sci. Inf. Technol., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 29–34, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8073756
M. Dimeli and A. Kostas, “The Role of ChatGPT in Education: Applications, Challenges: Insights From a Systematic Review,” J. Inf. Technol. Educ. Res., vol. 24, no. January, pp. 1–30, 2025, doi: 10.28945/5422.
R. Deng, M. Jiang, X. Yu, Y. Lu, and S. Liu, “Does ChatGPT enhance student learning? A systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental studies,” Comput. Educ., vol. 227, no. December 2024, p. 105224, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105224.
N. Binti Rohaizam, “ChatGPT: Between Opportunities and Challanges in Increasing Academic Productivity,” JPUA J. Perpust. Univ. Airlangga Media Inf. dan Komun. Kepustakawanan, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 54–60, 2024, doi: 10.20473/jpua.v14i1.2024.54-60.
A. Darvishi, H. Khosravi, S. Sadiq, D. Gašević, and G. Siemens, “Impact of AI assistance on student agency,” Comput. Educ., vol. 210, no. July 2023, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104967.
A. Adiyono, A. Said Al Matari, and F. Ferdian Dalimarta, “Analysis of Student Perceptions of the Use of ChatGPT as a Learning Media: A Case Study in Higher Education in the Era of AI-Based Education,” J. Educ. Teach., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 306–324, 2025, doi: 10.51454/jet.v6i2.538.
H. Yu, “The application and challenges of ChatGPT in educational transformation: New demands for teachers’ roles,” Heliyon, vol. 10, no. 2, p. e24289, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24289.
R. P. Suharto, Zubaidi, Nurdjizah, A. N. Putri, and Putri Sekarsari, “the Use of Ai-Based Writing Tools (Quillbot and Chatgpt) in Developing the Writing Competence of Language Learners,” Esteem J. English Educ. Study Program., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 259–269, 2025, doi: 10.31851/esteem.v8i2.18956.
K. R. Fitri, H. Praherdhiono, C. Kurniawan, F. Aulia, and U. N. Malang, “Pemanfaatan Artificial Intelegence (AI) ChatGPT dalam Pembelajaran Siswa Sekolah Menengah Keatas untuk Meningkatkan Kreativitas Siswa,” vol. 9, pp. 13803–13811, 2025.
D. A. Brown et al., “ENDF/B-VIII.0: The 8th Major Release of the Nuclear Reaction Data Library with CIELO-project Cross Sections, New Standards and Thermal Scattering Data,” Nucl. Data Sheets, vol. 148, no. December, pp. 1–142, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.nds.2018.02.001.
L. Isiaku, A. S. Muhammad, H. I. Kefas, and F. C. Ukaegbu, “Enhancing technological sustainability in academia: leveraging ChatGPT for teaching, learning and evaluation,” Qual. Educ. All, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 385–416, 2024, doi: 10.1108/QEA-07-2024-0055.
J. Steiss et al., “Comparing the quality of human and ChatGPT feedback of students’ writing,” Learn. Instr., vol. 91, no. September 2023, p. 101894, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894.
K. Nguyen-Trung, ChatGPT in thematic analysis: Can AI become a research assistant in qualitative research?, no. 0123456789. Springer Netherlands, 2025. doi: 10.1007/s11135-025-02165-z.
A. wibowo Khurniawan et al., Pemanfaatan Gen-AiDalam Pembelajaran KejuruanBagi Guru Smk Bidang Bisnis Dan Pariwisata. 2024.
T. Gupta and D. Pruthi, “All That Glitters is Not Novel: Plagiarism in AI Generated Research,” vol. 1, no. 2024, pp. 25721–25738, 2025, doi: 10.18653/v1/2025.acl-long.1249.
P. P. Ray, “ChatGPT: A comprehensive review on background, applications, key challenges, bias, ethics, limitations and future scope,” Internet Things Cyber-Physical Syst., vol. 3, no. March, pp. 121–154, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.iotcps.2023.04.003.
BPPT Indonesia, “Indonesia Energy OutLook 2017: Clean Energy Technology Development Initiatives (Indonesian and English),” Jakarta, 2017.
A. Adel, A. Ahsan, and C. Davison, “ChatGPT Promises and Challenges in Education: Computational and Ethical Perspectives,” Educ. Sci., vol. 14, no. 8, 2024, doi: 10.3390/educsci14080814.
N. Khan, Z. Khan, A. Koubaa, M. K. Khan, and R. bin Salleh, “Global insights and the impact of generative AI-ChatGPT on multidisciplinary: a systematic review and bibliometric analysis,” Conn. Sci., vol. 36, no. 1, 2024, doi: 10.1080/09540091.2024.2353630.
M. Lazimi, “Integrating Artificial Intelligence into Vocational Higher Education in Albania: Opportunities and Challenges,” Conf. Proceedings. Futur. Educ. 2025, no. 8872, 2025,
[Online].Available:https://conference.pixel-online.net/library_scheda.php?id_abs=7555&id_crs=2&id_edition=49&type=conference.