PENGARUH LINGKUNGAN KERJA NON FISIK DAN DISIPLIN KERJA TERHADAP KINERJA KARYAWAN PADA PT SATIRA UTAMA SATU CABANG TANGERANG
Abstract
This research aims to determine the influence of the work environment and work discipline on the performance of PT Satira Utama Satu employees. This research tests it partially or simultaneously using quantitative methods, with data collection carried out using several methods including literature study, documentation and questionnaires. The techniques used in this research use descriptive statistical analysis techniques, data quality testing and simple linear regressionanalysis. As for the research results, based on the t test, it is known that the value of the Work Environment variable (X1) is 1.711 and the t table is 1.676 (Df = n-k-1) so (52-2- 1=49) So the conclusion can be drawn that Ho is rejected and Ha is accepted, namely the Work Environment variable (X1) which partially has a significant influence on employee performance (Y) at PT Satira Utama Satu. It is known that the value of the Development variable (X2) is 5.206 and the t table is 1.676 (Df = n-k-1) so (52-2-1=49) and is also supported by the t count > t table. So the conclusion can be drawn that Ho is rejected and Ha is accepted, namely that the Work Environment variable (X1) partially has a significant influence on employee performance (Y) at PT Satira Utama Satu. the calculated f value > f table, so the basis for the calculation is df = (n - k - 1) so that f table is 3.19, then we get calculated f > f table (20.401 > 3.19) with a score ρ value < Sig. 0.05, which in this study is (0.000 < 0.05), so finally H3 in the study is accepted and Ho is rejected, which in this study has a significant impact on the independent variables on employee performance at PT Satira Utama Satu. Based on quantitative multiple regression analysis, it was concluded that Y= 29,303 + 0.081 (X1) + 0.497 (X2) from the results of the multiple linear regression analysis, it was found that the Work Environment (X1) and Work Discipline (X2) variables had a linear effect on the Employee Performance variable (Y). And with the correlation coefficient R value of 0.674, it can be concluded that this value is in the range 0.60 - 0.799, so the level of relationship between the variables Work Environment (X1) Work Discipline and (X2) and Employee Performance (Y) there is a strong level of relationship. The R result is 0.674, so in this case it is concluded that the Work Environment variable (X1) and the Work Discipline variable (X2) have an effect on the Employee Performance variable (Y) by 67.42% while (100- 67.4%) = 32.6% influenced by other factors
References
Afandi, Pandi. (2018). Disiplin Kerja dan Kinerja Karyawan. Jurnal Visionida, Vol.1, No. 1, Halaman 1-20.
Armstrong, M. (2022). Armstrong's Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice. London: Kogan Page.
Anggraini, N. (2022). Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan dan Lingkungan Kerja Terhadap Kedisiplinan Karyawan Pada PT. Bank Index Selindo KC.
Andriyani, N., Hamzah, R., & Siagian, R. (2020). Pengaruh Lingkungan Kerja Dan Disiplin Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Dan Motivasi Kerja Sebagai Variabel Intervening Pada PT. Aquavue Vision International. Jurnal Ekonomi Bisnis Indonesia (JEBI), 15(1), 1-12.
Agustini, Fauzia. (2019). Strategi Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Medan: UISU Press. ISBN 978-602-61486-9-8.
Astrinasari, S. (2021). Pengaruh Lingkungan Kerja dan Kompetensi Pegawai Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai. Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin.
Bumi Aksara.Fitriani, Sukarni Aprianinur, dan Nurjaya. (2018). Pengaruh Lingkungan Kerja
Cushway, B. (2021). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Penerbit Salemba Empat.
Daft, Richard L. (2020). Manajemen . Cengage Learning.
Darmadi, & Ratna Sari. (2022). Pengaruh Kompensasi, Budaya Organisasi Dan Motivasi Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai Perusahaan Daerah Air Minum (PDAM) Tirta Kerta Raharja Kabupaten Tangerang. Economic, Accounting,
Dessler, Gary. (2023). Human Resource Management. Pearson Education. Fitriani, Sukarni Aprianinur, dan Nurjaya. (2018). Pengaruh Lingkungan Kerja Griffin, Ricky W. (2021). Manajemen (edisi ke-13). Cengage Learning.
Hasibuan, Malayu S.P. (2022). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Hasibuan, M. S. P. (2020). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Bumi Aksara. Hasibuan, Malayu S.P. (2020). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia.
Haryanto, R. (2019). Manajemen. Duta Media Publishing. Hamzali et al., (2022), Manjemen.
Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2017). Organizational Behavior. Pearson. Randi. (2018). Teori Penelitian Terdahulu. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Sanjaya, R. (2020). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Yogyakarta: BPFE. Sihaloho, R. D., & Siregar, H. (2019). Pengaruh Lingkungan Kerja Terhadap Kinerja
Karyawan Pada PT. Super Setia Sagita Medan. Jurnal Ilmiah Socio Secretum, 9(2), 273-281.
Sinambela, Lijan Poltalk. (2018). Manajemen Kinerja: Pengelolaan, Pengukuran, dan Implikasi Kinerja. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Sinambela, Lijan Poltak. (2018). Manajemen Kinerja: Pengelolaan, Pengukuran, dan Implikasi Kinerja. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Sobirin, D. M., Barlian, B., & Sutrisna, A. (2022). Pengaruh Lingkungan Kerja dan Disiplin Kerja terhadap Kinerja Karyawan (Studi Kasus pada Karyawan di
KPO PT. BPR Cipatujah Jabar). Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin, 2(1), 83-91.
Sujarweni, V. W. (2019). Metodologi Penelitian. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Baru Press. Ghozali, I. (2018). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program IBM SPSS 25.
Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Suryani, K., Indartono, S., & Supriyadi, D. (2021). Manajemen dan Fungsi- Fungsinya.
